How To Put Belief Back Together Once You've Torn It Apart
Thinking about Ted Lasso and Marcus Borg
The Cottage August sampler continues with some of the best posts you may have missed.
Today, I’m sharing one of my favorite reflections — on the theme of belief in the wildly popular show, Ted Lasso. It was first published on February 6, 2022.
But the reflection isn’t just about Ted Lasso. It is also about Marcus Borg and his definition of belief. This post caught the attention of one of the most popular Ted Lasso podcasts. The hosts invited me on to talk about belief — and how believing was present (or not) on the show.
As it turned out, our conversation anticipated what emerged as a major theme of the show’s third and final season: Can you find belief again once it has been lost?
I guess I’ve learned a thing or two about finding faith back again after everything goes awry.
The original post is below. And, as a bonus, I’ve also shared the link to the podcast so you can listen in.
“I BELIEVE TED LASSO AND MARCUS BORG” from February 6, 2022:
I started watching Ted Lasso recently. The award-winning series (streaming on AppleTV) is about a cheerful Kansas football coach who winds up in London coaching AFC Richmond, a flailing English soccer team.
Ted Lasso has a dedicated fan base, a group that loves asking newcomers: Who is your favorite character? I love Ted (of course!), Rebecca (the team owner), and Roy Kent (the aging team star). But it is a quiet character, a background figure appearing in every show with only a single line, that I find utterly compelling: the BELIEVE sign.
I’ve not yet finished watching the available shows (so please no spoilers in the comments!). But that BELIEVE sign begs a question: What does it really mean to believe? Through all the team’s tensions, surprising victories, and painful losses, the sign hangs in the locker room, ambiguously omnipresent:
Is “believe” merely a kind of happy-talk self-help mantra, a sweet midwestern optimism oddly out-of-place in a more cynical world? BELIEVE and your dreams of winning and fame will come true.
Or, is “believe” something else? A disposition that is truthful, a practice that is transformative, a challenge to embrace, a struggle to endure? BELIEVE how? BELIEVE what? BELIEVE who? There are no predetermined answers, and finding a way to belief is messy.
From one perspective “BELIEVE” seems to taunt. If you believe hard enough, you will be rewarded. But, from the other, there is less clarity and maybe even unexpected sadness; BELIEVE seems to draw us toward our doubts and fears.
Almost twenty years ago, a few sentences in The Heart of Christianity by Marcus Borg revolutionized how I understood “believe”:
Prior to the seventeenth century, the word “believe” did not mean believing in the truth of statements or propositions, whether problematic or not. Grammatically, the object of believing was not statements, but a person. Moreover, the contexts in which it is used in premodern English make it clear that it meant: to hold dear; to prize; to give one’s loyalty to; to give one’s self to; to commit oneself. It meant. . . faithfulness, allegiance, loyalty, commitment, and trust.
Most simply, “to believe” meant “to love.” Indeed, the English words “believe” and “belove” are related. What we believe is what we belove. Faith is about beloving God. . . To believe in God is to belove God. Faith is about beloving God and all that God beloves. . . Faith is the way of the heart.
If the BELIEVE sign means “I believe that AFC Richmond will win the championship. I believe that. I believe,” well, then you’d be in trouble. That’s a statement about the truth of something.
But I’ve come to think that the BELIEVE sign means “I believe AFC Richmond. I believe this team,” and the point becomes clearer: I trust this team, I trust these people, I give my allegiance to you all. The BELIEVE sign doesn’t conjure our desires for a specific answer or outcome. Instead, it creates the possibility to become different players, a different team, and a different kind of community — one called forth in what we belove.
Although I’ve not yet watched the all the episodes of Ted Lasso, the story seems to be exploring BELIEVE through questions of “faithfulness, allegiance, loyalty, commitment, and trust” through the relationships between the various characters — and how BELIEVE and BELOVE are of a piece.
After all, how can we possibly believe without love?
BONUS LINK
Here’s the episode of “Richmond ‘Til We Die” — “How to Put Belief Back Together Once You’ve Torn It Apart”
INSPIRATION
Those who believe they believe in God, but without passion in the heart, without anguish of mind, without uncertainty, without doubt, and even at times without despair, believe only in the idea of God, and not in God himself.
―Madeleine L'Engle
Can we imagine a Christianity where the creed read:
I belove God the Father Almighty. . .
I belove Jesus Christ, his only son. . .
I belove the Holy Spirit. . . ?
What a difference that would make!
— Diana Butler Bass
LOOKING FOR MORE GOOD READING THIS WEEK?
This piece from Katharine Hayhoe, one of the leading climate scientists in North America, is honest, optimistic, and helpful. It is one of the best pieces I’ve read this summer on the climate crisis. And hey, I love the title: “We Are Not Doomed.” Glad to hear that!
I got in some trouble on the site formerly known as Twitter in the last few days criticizing Russell Moore, the editor of Christianity Today, and his new book. So, when the ever-delightful writer Holly Berkley Fletcher, the daughter of evangelical missionaries, backed me up in this funny and theologically-pointed essay, I couldn’t do anything but cheer. You’ll laugh — even while learning why evangelicalism as it exists is not redeemable.
So simple and yet so profound. Thank you.
There's a book called "saved by allegiance alone".
The greek word for faith / belief is pistus.
The books author finds the word used in Maccabees in a way that can only be interpreted as allegiance.
If you substitute allegiance for faith/belief in most texts it makes perfect sense.
It was also revolutionary because it was expected to give your allegiance to Ceasar.
Reading the definition of believe in this article was helpful and reminded me of the allegiance book.
I used to be in a church which was all about right beliefs - the right ones being theirs.
There is this gem on their statements of beliefs "the bible is innerant in the original manuscripts". Sound authorative, but is meaningless.
Of course we don't have these originals and if you read "Mary the Tower" it's clear some of the earliest copies were adjusted later.